Motivational Research
Motivational research (or behavioral science, if you prefer) seeks to discover and comprehend what consumers do not fully understand about themselves.
Implicitly, motivational research assumes the existence of unconscious motives or forces that influence consumer behavior. These motives or influences may be buried in the subconscious mind, or these influences may be external (cultural norms, or social pressures), or these influences might be so common and ordinary that consumers simply are unaware of them. Typically, these unconscious motives (or beyond-awareness influences) are intertwined with and complicated by conscious motives, economic variables, and fashion trends (broadly defined). Motivational research attempts to sift through all of these influences and factors to unravel the mystery of consumer behavior as it relates to a specific product or service, so that the marketer better understands the target audience and how to influence that audience.
Motivational research is most valuable when powerful underlying motives are suspected of exerting influence upon consumer behavior. Products and services that relate, or might relate, to attraction of the opposite sex, to personal adornment, to status or self-esteem, to power, to death, to deep-seated fears, or to social taboos are all likely candidates for motivational research. For example, why do women tend to increase their expenditures on clothing and personal adornment products as they approach the age of 50 to 55? The reasons might relate to the loss of youth’s beauty and the loss of fertility, and to related loss of self-esteem or perhaps fear of losing their husbands' love. It is also a time of life when discretionary incomes are rising (the children are leaving the nest). Other motives are at work as well (women are complicated creatures), but a standard marketing research survey would never reveal these motives, because most women are not really aware of why their interest in expensive adornments increases at this particular point in their lives.
Even benign, or low-involvement, product categories can often benefit from the insights provided by motivational research. Typically, in low-involvement product categories, perception variables and cultural influences are most important. Our culture is a system of rules and “regulations” that simplify and optimize our existence. Cultural rules govern how we squeeze a tube of toothpaste, how we open packages, how we use a bath towel, who does what work, etc. Most of us are relatively unaware of these cultural rules because they are so pervasive. Understanding how these cultural rules influence a particular product can be extremely valuable information for the marketer.
The Major Methods
The three major motivational research methods are observation (or ethnography), focus groups, and depth (or in-depth) interviews. There are many variations of these basic methods, and most can be applied online or in-person. In-person interactions with consumers are the “gold standard,” the very best way to really understand all the details of human behavior. With Zoom and mobile-phone cameras much can be learned, perhaps 75% to 80% of what can be learned by in-person experiences.
Ethnography or observation can be a fruitful method of deriving hypotheses about human behavior. All of us are familiar with anthropologists living with the “natives” to understand their behavior. This same systematic observation can produce equally insightful results about consumer behavior. Observation can be accomplished in-person or through the convenience of cameras and videos. Usually, personal observation is expensive, and most consumers don’t want an anthropologist living in their household for a month or two.
It is easier to observe consumers in buying situations than in their homes, and here the observation can be in-person or by video cameras. Generally, video is less intrusive than an in-person observer. Finding a representative set of cooperative stores, however, is not an easy task, and the installation and maintenance of video cameras is not without its difficulties. In-store observers can be used as well, so long as they have some “cover” that makes their presence less obvious. But, observation by video or human eye cannot answer every question. Generally, observation must be supplemented by focus groups or depth interviews to fully understand why consumers are doing what they do.
The Focus Group
The focus group in the hands of a skilled moderator can be a valuable motivational research technique. To reach its full motivational potential, the group interview must be largely nondirective in style, and the group must achieve spontaneous interaction. It is the mutual reinforcement within the group (the group excitement and spontaneity) that produces the revelations and behaviors that reveal unconscious motives. In a sense, the group must achieve “spontaneous combustion” for the secrets of human behavior to surface. A focus group actively led by the moderator with direct questioning of respondents seldom yields deep understanding.
The Depth Interview
The heart and soul of motivational research is the depth interview, a lengthy , one-on-one (one to two hours), a personal interview conducted directly by an experienced qualitative expert researcher. Much of the power of the depth interview is dependent upon the insight, sensitivity, and skill of the moderator. The interviewing task cannot be delegated to traditional marketing research interviewers—who have no training in motivational techniques.
During the personal interview, the motivational researcher strives to create an empathic relationship with each respondent, a feeling of rapport, mutual trust, and understanding. The moderator creates a climate in which the respondent feels free to express her feelings and her thoughts, without fear of embarrassment or rejection. The researcher conveys a feeling that the respondent and her opinions are important and worthwhile, no matter what those opinions are. The motivational researcher is accepting, nonthreatening, supportive, and very interested in whatever the participant shares. The emotional empathy between the qualitative researcher and respondent is the single most important determinant of a revealing and effective interview.
The motivational researcher relies heavily upon nondirective interviewing techniques. The goal is to get the respondent to talk, and keep talking. The researcher tends to introduce general topics, rather than ask direct questions. The moderator probes by raising her eyebrows, by a questioning look upon her face, by paraphrasing what the respondent has said, or by reflecting the respondent’s own words back to the respondent in a questioning tone. Nondirective techniques are the least threatening and the least biasing to the respondent.
Projective techniques can play an important role. Sometimes a respondent can see in others what he cannot see—or will not admit—about himself. The motivational researcher often asks the respondent to tell a story, play a role, draw a picture, complete a sentence, or associate words with a stimulus. Photographs, product samples, packages, and advertisements can also be used as stimuli to evoke additional feelings, imagery, and comments.
During the interview, the researcher watches for clues that might indicate a “sensitive nerve” has been touched. Long pauses by the respondent, slips of the tongue, fidgeting, variations in voice pitch, strong emotions, facial expressions, eye movements, avoidance of a question, fixation on an issue, and body language are some of the clues the motivational researcher keys on. These “sensitive” topics and issues are then the focus of additional inquiry and exploration later in the interview.
Each depth interview is video-recorded and transcribed. A typical motivational study, consisting of 30 to 40 depth interviews, yields 1,000 to 2,000 pages of verbatim dialogue. During the interview itself, the motivational researcher makes notes about the respondent’s behavior, mannerisms, physical appearance, personality characteristics, and nonverbal communication. These notes become a road map to help the researcher understand and interpret the verbatim transcript of the interview.
The Analysis
The motivational researcher reads and rereads the hundreds of pages of verbatim respondent dialogue. As she reads, the researcher looks for systematic patterns of response. She identifies logical inconsistencies or apparent contradictions. She compares direct responses against projective responses. She notes the consistent use of unusual words or phrases. She studies the explicit content of the interview and contemplates its meaning in relation to the implicit content. She searches for what is not said as diligently as she does for what is said. Like a detective, she sifts through the clues and the evidence to deduce the forces and motives influencing consumer behavior. No one clue or piece of evidence is treated as being very important. It is the convergence of evidence and facts that leads to significant conclusions. In the scientific tradition, empiricism and logic must come together and make sense.
The analysis begins at the cultural level. Cultural values and influences are the ocean in which we all swim and, of which most of us are completely unaware. What we eat, the way we eat, how we dress, what we think and feel, and the language we speak are dimensions of our culture. These taken-for-granted cultural dimensions are the basic building blocks that begin the motivational researcher’s analysis. The culture is the context that must be understood before the behavior of individuals within the context can be understood. Every product has cultural values and rules that influence its perception and its usage.
Once the cultural context is reasonably well understood, the next analytic step is the exploration of the unique motivations that relate to the product category. What psychological needs does the product fulfill? Does the product have any social or symbolic meanings? Does the product relate to one’s status aspirations, to competitive drives, to feelings of self-esteem, to security needs? Are masochistic motives involved? And so on. Some of these motives must be inferred since respondents are often unaware of why they do what they do. But the analysis is not complete.
The last major dimension that must be understood is the business environment, including competitive forces, brand perceptions and images, relative market shares, the role of advertising in the category, and trends in the marketplace. Only part of this business environment knowledge can come from the respondent, of course, but understanding the business context is crucial to the interpretation of consumer motives in a way that will lead to useful results. Understanding the consumer’s motives is worthless unless somehow that knowledge can be translated into actionable marketing and advertising recommendations.
Sometimes a motivational study is followed by quantitative surveys to confirm the motivational hypotheses as well as to measure the relative extent of those motives in the general population. But many times motivational studies cannot be proved or disproved by survey research, especially when completely unconscious motives are involved. In these cases, the final evaluation of the hypothesized motives is by the testing of concepts (or advertising alternatives) that address the different motives, or by other types of contrived experiments.
One final note is relevant to the successful conduct of motivational research. It is critically important that the motivational researcher not be overly theoretical. An eclectic, wide ranging, and open-minded philosophical perspective is best. The researcher should not formulate any “cast in stone” hypotheses before he conducts the motivational study. Strongly held hypotheses, or rigid adherence to theory, will doom a motivational study to failure. Too often we see what we set out to see, or find that for which we search, whether it exists or not. An objective, open, unfettered mind is the motivational researcher’s greatest asset.
Author
Jerry W. Thomas
Chief Executive Officer
Jerry founded Decision Analyst in September 1978. The firm has grown over the years and is now one of the largest privately held, employee-owned research agencies in North America. The firm prides itself on mastery of advanced analytics, predictive modeling, and choice modeling to optimize marketing decisions, and is deeply involved in the development of leading-edge analytic software. Jerry plays a key role in the development of Decision Analyst’s proprietary research services and related mathematical models.
Jerry graduated from the University of Texas at Arlington, earned his MBA at the University of Texas at Austin, and studied graduate economics at SMU.
Copyright © 2025 by Decision Analyst, Inc.
This posting may not be copied, published, or used in any way without written permission of Decision Analyst.